-
• #62652
-
• #62653
- it's on stands innit?
I already subtracted the stand to get 2°45'
- it's on stands innit?
-
• #62654
from current projects
-
• #62655
Oh that dolan>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-
• #62656
Don't get why this bike hasn't had more love:
SS couplers are amazing for a start. This bike just looks quick. What is it?because he's spoilt a perfectly good panasonic frame with a s&s couplings - why would a 52cm frame need to be split!? it's still quite a large parcel to pack for travelling, i only see the point of splitting large frames (59cm+) because they can be really tight squeeze into flight bags
this man has basically ruined a good paint job and spent £500+ on adding a few hundred grams to his frame. total douche. anti-porn please
-
• #62657
the ultimate in anti s&s porn
-
• #62658
Repost.
-
• #62659
-
• #62660
As the picture illustrated, even a small frame can fit in a smaller big with an s&s coupling, so I still think it make sense.
-
• #62661
bike to actual porn... not the greatest but more on track i hope - today it is weight weenie ti and carbon pron.
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg833/scaled.php?server=833&filename=dsc0044sm.jpg&res=landing
http://www.snortingbullphoto.com/photos/i-Gvb7KDk/0/L/i-Gvb7KDk-L.jpg
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a23/internetphotos/Lynskey%20Helix%20OS/LynskeyHelixOS.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2579/4023747404_e1c663828c_b.jpg
http://www.stefan-rohner.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/colnago-c40.jpg
http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/4467/storck007.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7134/7013718503_82b29d3fca_c.jpg
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s132/ramjm_2000/Lynskey/P1010073.jpg
-
• #62662
That stem is fecking ridiculous.
£560!!!
-
• #62663
As the picture illustrated, even a small frame can fit in a smaller big with an s&s coupling, so I still think it make sense.
it's smaller but is it £500 worth smaller? i don't think so - plus the couplers are shit to take on and off
this... by removing wheels, handlebar, stem and pedals
or
if you can be bothered to dismantle the bike entirely with s&s couplings...
either way you ain't walking anywhere with it!
-
• #62664
It does but why the £600 price tag?
-
• #62665
I refuse to believe that all these people who get couplers actually use them
-
• #62666
I refuse to believe that all these people who get couplers actually use them
i have experienced this first hand - a lady travelling from the US and got here - couldn't put the bike back together because she didn't have the tool! nice...
i would however be tempted if i saw a used frame in my size because the 4 bags i've tried do not fit a 24" frame in well at all and my current one which just about works won't actually fit in to the boot of a rental car on the other side! i can't possibly see a reason for a normal sized frame though
-
• #62667
-
• #62668
saddle position can GTFO
-
• #62669
Brooks is so out of place....
+1
-
• #62670
I don't think the cock ring is supposed to go on that end.
-
• #62671
:) i can't get my head round it! why would anything think that is a good idea!?
-
• #62672
-
• #62673
^ interesting forks but i will never like the look of shimano ergo shifters and those edge stems are fugly
-
• #62674
@ the scoble posted firefly -
Lovely but would be 10x better with rack mounts. -
• #62675
which way is front?