-
• #57151
-
• #57152
that tandem trike is an awesome machine!
I remember having seen it (or its twin) in the steel (or is it Ti) somewhere before
I posted it here before. Shocking photos unfortunately. I saw it waiting at the ferry port in Jersey. renolds 725 I think, some lovely filet and lug work.
http://i926.photobucket.com/albums/ad106/hugo7_photos/e68c87ae.jpg
http://i926.photobucket.com/albums/ad106/hugo7_photos/50c675ca.jpg...never know there might be some better shots on the web.
-
• #57153
Well done Toby
-
• #57154
Nice post Toby :)
-
• #57155
odd lever placement
-
• #57156
how do you post the picture of the bike?
-
• #57157
Print it, stick it in an envelope and send it off?
-
• #57158
-
• #57159
i just put these on my bike and they are so good!
-
• #57160
-
• #57161
Wow. Got anymore stuff we've seen before?
-
• #57162
what happened to the laser with the fugly discs?
-
• #57163
-
• #57164
what about all of these, seen them all?
-
• #57165
Fuck me. Really?
That BIanchi is an abomination
-
• #57166
what about all of these, seen them all?
-
• #57167
yer fair enough, the pinarello is worse!
-
• #57168
Why do you post it then?
-
• #57169
yer fair enough, the pinarello is worse!
It's not and actually the only porn worthy bicycle of your lot. A fine example of a no compromise performance machine from an innovative period in competitive cycling.
-
• #57170
ok, i apologise for posting something, what are the exact specifications of bike porn? surely its all opinion and the reason i posted some photos is because, it really annoys me when i come on this thread and see loads words; i want to see great bikes.
-
• #57171
post great bikes, not indifferent ones
-
• #57172
Have a look at some of the more regular posters, and ideally trawl a good few hundred of the pages and check the dates of the photos you're choosing. Those are surely the golden rules to avoid flaming...
-
• #57173
-
• #57174
Saddle angle fail... -
• #57175
test