-
• #56652
Needs less/more trispok or more disc. Looks turd with a blinging front wheel and a boggo rear.
-
• #56653
-
• #56654
les will never make it here
.... bitter, bitter lies.
-
• #56655
With such a fat fork on the Concorde, is that strut really necessary?
-
• #56656
errr its part of the fork ?!
talking about fat forks...
-
• #56657
Are you trying to look dumber than me?
-
• #56658
This is a forum, I can't see exactly how dumb you look so I don't know how hard I have to try.
-
• #56659
Are you trying to look dumber than me?
he does it effortlessly, there is no try
-
• #56660
Question still stands:
Is this strut to make up for an under-engineered fork, or are these guys really on to something? -
• #56661
Sorry I couldn't tell you, may have to wait for le testre.
-
• #56662
wait for le testre.
If I had to guess, I'd say aerodynamic splitter rather than structural reinforcement.
-
• #56663
'aerodynamic splitter'
Oof, possibly even more contentious territory.
Thanks for the replies. -
• #56664
Awesome singlar. Not sure about that thing above it tho.
a frame made by one of the top 3 frame builders (in steel) in the world. unlike that taiwanese stovepipe singular
-
• #56665
Vanilla, Richard Sachs & Pegoretti?
Not necessarily in that order.
-
• #56666
-
• #56667
very very similar to my winter build a few years ago.. i miss that bike
:(
and yes as mr smyth mentioned - any speedvagon is porn... but singulars are attainable porn by mere mortals
-
• #56668
-
• #56669
-
• #56670
↑↑I'm troubled by the wheels; are those cyclocross wheels on a 29er? Doesn't seem like a good plan. They're not even lighter than Reynolds proper 'niner wheels
-
• #56671
That BJ looks the tits.
-
• #56672
Oh man, thats lovely, why you so tall?
-
• #56673
...BJ...tits.
Wrong kind of porn :-)
-
• #56674
Oh man, thats lovely, why you so tall?
Tall works better with BJ.
-
• #56675
Wrong kind of porn :-)
les will never make it here