-
• #37552
wasn't that your old bike T? Always liked that frame
-
• #37553
yeah sold it on to someone in the forum last year (ex readers wives - does that count?)
it was crazy light but too small for me as you can see
-
• #37554
possibly the nicest road frame i've seen - shame it's about 10cm too small for me
Jinbok (David) Lee's MAX Road Frame by bishopbikes, on Flickr
Jinbok (David) Lee's MAX Road Frame by bishopbikes, on Flickr
Jinbok (David) Lee's MAX Road Frame by bishopbikes, on Flickr
Jinbok (David) Lee's MAX Road Frame by bishopbikes, on Flickr -
• #37555
love it!
Look stupidly fun;
-
• #37556
love it!
[QUOTE=edscoble;1730636]Look stupidly fun;
holy sht!!
:D
-
• #37557
Flat BMX crankless
-
• #37558
^ Looks nice, but is that just one of these for "grown ups"?
-
• #37559
-
• #37560
super ted and benedict build
was at the art show for the film festival
-
• #37561
Ugly stem, triple cranks and a nice sit up and beg possition.
Not porn!
-
• #37562
It belongs to a girl, which explains the position which is common on women's road bikes.
-
• #37563
interesting KHS.
-
• #37564
Big ring porn:
That's 73 teeth.
Why o why?
-
• #37565
riding behind a motorcycle or car?
-
• #37566
probably for going fast.
-
• #37567
Looking through the flicker for Bishop Bikes and there's some amazing stuff on there.
-
• #37568
metallic porn : not completely awesome but still pretty nice
pretentious photo!
-
• #37569
not a big fan of lopro+risers but cool looking frame - apparently teflon coated!
-
• #37570
no thats nice. needs a proper stem though. much lower and slightly longer
-
• #37571
Big ring porn:
That's 73 teeth.
Coming to a badass internet blog near you soon!!!... probably.
-
• #37572
probably for going fast.
unless hes going for some sort of record it just looks a bit pointless
-
• #37573
unless hes going for some sort of record it just looks a bit pointless
NikB is f-in fast, and he goes so fast by carefully trying all sorts of rather non-traditional things which suit him, such as in this case riding with an unusually slow cadence, typically about 65rpm. Here's his stats:
P.B.s:
10 - 18:59
25 - 49:52
50 - 1:39:02
100 - 3:37:08
12 - 289.84You can tell him his huge chainring is pointless when you've beaten these times.
-
• #37574
Any idea how he got on with the 65rpm test as sounds interesting?
-
• #37575
That wasn't a 'test', it's how he rides all the time, having established through testing that it's what works best for him. Does it on 165mm cranks, too, which again is unusual, as slow revving testers usually favour long cranks. Look at the times; it seems to be working.
Nice looking F&F, wank build