a key point for me from that Coppola comment link - what right does Scotland have to try and end the UK with the rUK having no say in that?
Huh? Is there something I'm missing here? Why should a population made up of three different nationalities have any right to dictate how a different population and another distinct nationality engages in their own nation-building exercise?
Even if we ignore the issue of nationality (which is fine by me. Stupid nationalities), there is surely still a larger right to self-determination awarded to the people who live somewhere rather than those who don't? Should the home counties have some say in the workings of London because they have a historic economic and political relationship?
Huh? Is there something I'm missing here? Why should a population made up of three different nationalities have any right to dictate how a different population and another distinct nationality engages in their own nation-building exercise?
Even if we ignore the issue of nationality (which is fine by me. Stupid nationalities), there is surely still a larger right to self-determination awarded to the people who live somewhere rather than those who don't? Should the home counties have some say in the workings of London because they have a historic economic and political relationship?