Is the writer trying to convert people who like polo to hating it? Or unite people who do not like polo to reinforce their dislike and somehow stage some kind of protest?
It seems like he actually really likes polo and would like to instigate some rule changes to improve the sport. So he's spending quite a lot of time thinking about the game and would like to see a future?
So confuse. We all know polo is lame. But it's something to fill the time between working and realising you're going to die. So I'll keep at it for now.
It's very obviously and explicitly the latter.
I don't think polo has to worry about "uniting" people who "hate polo". Do such people exist? Why would they care?
It's very obviously and explicitly the latter.
I don't think polo has to worry about "uniting" people who "hate polo". Do such people exist? Why would they care?