I am still waiting for further details on the new rules (that combined with me prepping up for the new job). The concerns expressed for the icing rule at Downs is well received but read further.
Is there any objection for paying a small sum in order that we book lights to allow get more games? I would expect it to be dark by 4 come December hence 11-4 isn't that much of a gap to get much games going.
If peeps are not inclined to pay then maybe Mitch? Perfect court to test the icing rule (I have no vested interest in testing this rule out, just highlighting as one of the advantage of playing at Mitch if peeps don't want to pay for lights at Downs, there's also the former George Orwell just down the road).
I am still waiting for further details on the new rules (that combined with me prepping up for the new job). The concerns expressed for the icing rule at Downs is well received but read further.
Is there any objection for paying a small sum in order that we book lights to allow get more games? I would expect it to be dark by 4 come December hence 11-4 isn't that much of a gap to get much games going.
If peeps are not inclined to pay then maybe Mitch? Perfect court to test the icing rule (I have no vested interest in testing this rule out, just highlighting as one of the advantage of playing at Mitch if peeps don't want to pay for lights at Downs, there's also the former George Orwell just down the road).