The article was making the point that Adebayor deserved to be in the side ahead of Defoe
He seems to be making the point that Defoe is not that good, and even though he has a decent scoring record he needs a lot of chances to score them and contributes very little else. The author seems to do a good job of this by using actual numbers. Just because Adebayor turned out to be a bit shit that season doesn't make his points regarding Defoe wrong.
He seems to be making the point that Defoe is not that good, and even though he has a decent scoring record he needs a lot of chances to score them and contributes very little else. The author seems to do a good job of this by using actual numbers. Just because Adebayor turned out to be a bit shit that season doesn't make his points regarding Defoe wrong.