You are reading a single comment by @Miss_Mouse and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I agree about the slogan David - but like I said, it doesn't have to mean segregation.

    Another pedestrian, three years old this time, killed in London today. Is it about time we forgot campaigning just about 'space for cycling' as a primary objective, and started teaming up with pedestrians? When I started a thread about gyratories a while back, part of my reasoning was about how much improved the shoreditch triangle was when returned to two-way traffic, for everybody, specifically vulnerable road users, meaning those who most benefitted were those not in or on any kind of vehicle (except wheelchair users, who I would include with pedestrians as benefitting most).

    Time we WALKED our bikes on a march, in solidarity with pedestrians? Seriously?!

    Agree completely!
    Its about how we want places to feel and function for everyone.

    Cycle campaigners need to team up with people who wish to live in non-motor dominated spaces and speak as one voice (which they do in some places)
    Which is why my group work with Living Streets. We are all pedestrians at times, after all and it's as dangerous to be a ped in London...

About

Avatar for Miss_Mouse @Miss_Mouse started