surely whether you call it "longer legs" or "shorter spines" is beside the point?
I might as well have said male 5'8" - spine 2" longer than female 5'7", no?
I think what hippy and I are pointing out (since you are referring to what the point is or isn't) is that your generalisations are simply too... generalised to be useful.
Oh.. before I forget.. No women don't have longer legs then men.
surely whether you call it "longer legs" or "shorter spines" is beside the point?
I might as well have said male 5'8" - spine 2" longer than female 5'7", no?
I think what hippy and I are pointing out (since you are referring to what the point is or isn't) is that your generalisations are simply too... generalised to be useful.