-
after visiting my girlfirends family (she's austrian) I will challenge everyone daring to put a slash inbetween those two - I am fluent in german and did not understand a word there..
What did you expect? They were speaking Austrian.
-
It wasn't you one of the crying babies about NSFW posting a while ago? What a muppet.
Sigh...
Let's compare and contrast:
marcom posts pictures of full nudity and BDSM and is reported by multiple people (who I don't know to be friends or in collusion) in a short span of time who share a view that the material is unsuitable for inline display on LFGSS and and some of whom feel that it represents larger issues of sexism and misogynism.gridds posts a single picture which features no nudity and is reported by no-one (not even marcom), yet marcom goes on a rant about it.
Hardly like events.
But even then, if I treated the whining in this thread as a report then I'd still do nothing because I don't moderate if only 1 person complains, and I ignore reports if I perceive any chips-on-shoulders or bias on behalf of the person(s) making the reports.
As the only person complaining, marcom you exhibit both a minority view, and a person with a grudge. So I would not moderate in this instance.
It's really very simple. Terribly simple. The community set the standards, and they let me know what is unacceptable by reporting stuff. That's subjective and so it can change over time and I only see this by how people react in a thread or by reporting stuff, what flies today may not tomorrow... it's your responsibility as someone who is a part of the community to be aware of what the community accepts or not.
If you cross the line, they let you know, and they may let me know... if you choose to ignore that and act like an ignorant oaf or a bull in a china shop, then you'll end up getting warned or banned. If you consciously ignore it and choose to purposefully challenge it... you will end up banned.
And you can moan all you like about it. But that's the way it is. And you can get pissed at me, but in many ways I'm just the messenger. I work very hard to examine my own interventions to try and keep them free of my own views. I could not care less if you develop a chip on your shoulder about me, I'm going to carry on listening to what I'm told by the community at large.
Fundamentally you have a choice and only you can take it. Either you make minor adjustments and fit in with the community standards and adapt when those subjective lines move, effectively choosing to stay... or you butt up against the line until you get banned, effectively choosing to leave.
It doesn't bother me which you choose, but the incessant whining is rather pathetic and tiring, hardly stuff that anyone would want to read. The situation has been spelled out so many times that you can hardly pretend to be unaware of how it works or what will happen. Your choice as to how you want to behave marcom.
-
I should also note that I got an email about this post too: https://www.lfgss.com/thread31273-112.html#post3409660
But have I done anything? Nope.
Why? Because it's an isolated report and doesn't seem to be reflected by the community at large.
I do nothing about the vast majority of reports. Doing nothing is a perfectly good thing to do.
So you've got to ask yourself, if I have to intervene is it really acceptable behaviour?
-
Sigh...
Let's compare and contrast:
marcom posts pictures of full nudity and BDSM and is reported by multiple people (who I don't know to be friends or in collusion) in a short span of time who share a view that the material is unsuitable for inline display on LFGSS and and some of whom feel that it represents larger issues of sexism and misogynism.gridds posts a single picture which features no nudity and is reported by no-one (not even marcom), yet marcom goes on a rant about it.
Hardly like events.
But even then, if I treated the whining in this thread as a report then I'd still do nothing because I don't moderate if only 1 person complains, and I ignore reports if I perceive any chips-on-shoulders or bias on behalf of the person(s) making the reports.
As the only person complaining, marcom you exhibit both a minority view, and a person with a grudge. So I would not moderate in this instance.
It's really very simple. Terribly simple. The community set the standards, and they let me know what is unacceptable by reporting stuff. That's subjective and so it can change over time and I only see this by how people react in a thread or by reporting stuff, what flies today may not tomorrow... it's your responsibility as someone who is a part of the community to be aware of what the community accepts or not.
If you cross the line, they let you know, and they may let me know... if you choose to ignore that and act like an ignorant oaf or a bull in a china shop, then you'll end up getting warned or banned. If you consciously ignore it and choose to purposefully challenge it... you will end up banned.
And you can moan all you like about it. But that's the way it is. And you can get pissed at me, but in many ways I'm just the messenger. I work very hard to examine my own interventions to try and keep them free of my own views. I could not care less if you develop a chip on your shoulder about me, I'm going to carry on listening to what I'm told by the community at large.
Fundamentally you have a choice and only you can take it. Either you make minor adjustments and fit in with the community standards and adapt when those subjective lines move, effectively choosing to stay... or you butt up against the line until you get banned, effectively choosing to leave.
It doesn't bother me which you choose, but the incessant whining is rather pathetic and tiring, hardly stuff that anyone would want to read. The situation has been spelled out so many times that you can hardly pretend to be unaware of how it works or what will happen. Your choice as to how you want to behave marcom.
i agree that you have to act on what the forum says but..........i believe Marcom has highlighted a point here and i think there is some double standard stuff going on.
(booooooooooring opinion thusly:)
peoples problem with him and his images is that they were unsuitable and not safe for work. (techincally none of this sight is safe for work - it's not work?!?!) annnnyway.
ignoring the nonsense between them all (which incidentally i, again, totally agree with Marcom....i don't know the guy or whatever but we're supposed to be adults and nudity / perceived 'misogyny'
is totally irrelevant when it comes to art). the gif with the lady drinking beer is totally the same - IN FACT waaaaay worse as it isn't an artistic thing. but, to be an adult again, i must assume some people think of this gif as an art form therefore i don't cry to my mother for comfort and therefore i dont moan.those who accept that gif as 'ok' but Marcom's provocative taste in photography need to, in the words of the forum, HTFU.
surely?
my opinion is boring.
i'm sure i tirade awaits.
marcom
deleted
O'Shane
GoodAdes
neu
drew87
Oliver Schick
Velocio
adroit
mmccarthy
CasaSteve
urt
-
Post a reply
About
.gifs
Posted by
@chris_crash
What does this even mean?
Also. Context, dickface.