So the age of the person who was annoyed with an idiot who "casually" broke the law is as unimportant as their sexual preference, their religion or their ethic background. Why raise it?
Or is this yet another example of the liberal elite seeking to dismiss people on grounds of prejudice?
So the age of the person who was annoyed with an idiot who "casually" broke the law is as unimportant as their sexual preference, their religion or their ethic background. Why raise it?
Or is this yet another example of the liberal elite seeking to dismiss people on grounds of prejudice?