One thing that grates on me more and more is that some of the rugby commentary is pretty good whilst match reports and analysis in the papers are almost always above the football standard.
Is it because they dumb it down for their audience or is it because talking about tactics doesn't interest the general public?
One thing that grates on me more and more is that some of the rugby commentary is pretty good whilst match reports and analysis in the papers are almost always above the football standard.
Is it because they dumb it down for their audience or is it because talking about tactics doesn't interest the general public?