I refer to this obviously. Not an attack or any type of problem with Nick Nack's objections. In fact I'd have thought that the tone of my 1st post (above) makes it fairly obvious that I'm up for a conversation about it and not particularly interested in VP's sex appeal.
I refer to this obviously. Not an attack or any type of problem with Nick Nack's objections. In fact I'd have thought that the tone of my 1st post (above) makes it fairly obvious that I'm up for a conversation about it and not particularly interested in VP's sex appeal.