You are reading a single comment by @deleted and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Its a genuinely depressing read, that thread. As far as I can work out you need to have been consistently brilliant from the moment you turn pro to win anything now and be above suspicion. Despite the fact Sky fielded an overpowered team and still climbed slower than a Grand Tour field would have done they are seemingly guilty simply by winning and placing other team members high up the GC

    hilarious all the guys calling Sky 'UK Postal' when most Americans have only just come around to the fact that Lance was dirty-and even then there is a hell of a lot who haven't and won't. Shame they couldn't get their own house in order before conveniently using USPS's example to smear other teams...

    Wiggins beating an off the boil Cancellara and Martin in a Dauphine ITT is hardly world shattering news. Having some columbian tow-boats pacing him up the climbs on a 1 week course isn't either... I just find the examples and the timing used to corroborate doping bizarre. Hailing Wiggo's pre 2008 palmares as proof of doping is just stupid.

    Man. I don't even like Wiggins or Sky but that thread makes me really despair for some of the cunts out there that revel in this shit. Tolerate 7 TDF victories from a bonafide fuckend riding proven dopers off his wheel with the help of some total ringers on board, then wait till he retires before suddenly wising up, why don't you all?

About

Avatar for deleted @deleted started