Do the low voting figures for the LFGSS poll reflect a wider voter apathy?
Not scientific in any way but thread has had 4000 odd views but only 144 votes (ignoring guests unable to vote and multiple re-views by same person) which suggests many things but perhaps a lack of engagement or apathy....or has had 321 contributions and 144 votes so a fairly respectable but still low 45% of contributors voted (ignoring multi-contributions by same person)
Do the low voting figures for the LFGSS poll reflect a wider voter apathy?
Not scientific in any way but thread has had 4000 odd views but only 144 votes (ignoring guests unable to vote and multiple re-views by same person) which suggests many things but perhaps a lack of engagement or apathy....or has had 321 contributions and 144 votes so a fairly respectable but still low 45% of contributors voted (ignoring multi-contributions by same person)
Needs more science.