it is still a blood transfusion though from what i understand and even if it wasn't against the rules at the time it does rather indicate a doping attitude.
Does a few millilitres of blood being removed, exposed to a UV light, then put back in really consitute a 'transfusion'?
There is no case to answer as this treatment was not banned at the time. Case closed.
Does a few millilitres of blood being removed, exposed to a UV light, then put back in really consitute a 'transfusion'?
There is no case to answer as this treatment was not banned at the time. Case closed.