Maybe it's just me, but I can't stand that National Geographic cum Reader's Digest style of story telling, even more so when it presents supposition, speculation and opinion as fact, and draws conclusions from the flimsiest of evidence.
Don't get me wrong - Some parts were good, in that they were very readable and enjoyable. But the masque of whimsy was just too thickly applied.
yeah sure you can, Im on it now, near the end.
loving the counter cultural references, the rock and roll ness of it, but Im a sucka for all that U.S Beatstuff, Dharma Bums is one my favourite books ever,
now you mention it, yeah it is trashy, without crafted characterisation.
but there are sections that ignite the imagination, just loved the part about when youre a kid- and run around like fuck, just for the sheer feeling of it, I usd to do this and constantly get bollocked for it at school,
been recreating that enjoyment feeling when training recently, never do care about timing etc but its making my actual races faster,
tonight- trails on talbot heath, long hill reps, 5,5,5, hour running then went to try the track in the dark--woooo dont be afraid of the dark
yeah sure you can, Im on it now, near the end.
loving the counter cultural references, the rock and roll ness of it, but Im a sucka for all that U.S Beatstuff, Dharma Bums is one my favourite books ever,
now you mention it, yeah it is trashy, without crafted characterisation.
but there are sections that ignite the imagination, just loved the part about when youre a kid- and run around like fuck, just for the sheer feeling of it, I usd to do this and constantly get bollocked for it at school,
been recreating that enjoyment feeling when training recently, never do care about timing etc but its making my actual races faster,
tonight- trails on talbot heath, long hill reps, 5,5,5, hour running then went to try the track in the dark--woooo dont be afraid of the dark