Bike porn

^^I thought Look had rights on Mondrian?

^^I thought Look had rights on Mondrian?

Not Mondrian on DMT.

https://www.lfgss.com/thread74068.html#post2464439

saddle angle - always downhill

tom - you are the king of anti, your attempts at pron are more Razzle than GGG, Ben Dover than Max Hardcore

I want that frame/fork.

^ Max Hardcore? I've heard of Ben Dover.

Fat Chances always had the best paint. I always liked the Harlequin (blue one side, green the other).

I always preferred Mountain Goat's for paint. :]

How long will MDCC take?

Forever on that one. I've seen that kind of spring energy storage/recovery system in a rear wheel, but not in that exact form at the crank.

saddle angle - always downhill

tom - you are the king of anti, your attempts at pron are more Razzle than GGG, Ben Dover than Max Hardcore

):

i real like both them...

gonna fall back on the old "no posty, no talky"

With all the talk about parts not matching, I'm surprised nobody mentioned the rear brake cable routing on the Milwaukee cross bike being in the worst place possible.

Oh shit.

You have a point there. I think it might have crap mud clearance too. It's described as a bike designed for the road that you can take on a cross course.

• Designed for use as fixed-gear or single-speed road bike.
• Designed with road bike geometry for stability and comfort.
• Set-up with Canti Studs in the back so you can take it cyclocrossing.

...and it's max tyre is 32c (not great).

I think I was drunk on the paint fade.

Hi is anybody know what is this fork?
http://www.beijingfg.com/photo_show.php?catid=204
Thanks!

It's a standard fork that comes on a Leader 725 frame.
Try doing some very basic googling http://leaderbikeusa.com/?page_id=41

Now get out of the porn thread.

and it's bolted onto a ridiculously minging bike... good work!

oh hold on, this is the porn thread, not anti....

sorry mate....

no thank you.. through that picture I've just stumbled accross an amazing collection of ugly bikes, and this

which i rather like.

yeah I see what you mean, i'm not sure about the grips but yeah.

I reckon a longer stem would be better, and grips maybe excusable with brooks...

It's a standard fork that comes on a Leader 725 frame.
Try doing some very basic googling http://leaderbikeusa.com/?page_id=41

Now get out of the porn thread.

you know I don't think it actually are, the leader ones have got different fork ends, just sayin...

Wtf!?

it's for sell http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=290620246466&clk_rvr_id=273743956680#ht_6061wt_1090

no thank you.. through that picture I've just stumbled accross an amazing collection of ugly bikes, and this

which i rather like.

looks really nice, but with short stem and bar like I wouldnt find riding brakeless fun. Wont be that stable putting weight on the front of the bike. Low gear though.

It looks setup for the cycling equivalent of 'taking a stroll'.

is it 10 pitch? can't really tell....

it's set up quite like my bike, but my bars are much further foward than that. Looks like it'd be pretty twitchy.

you know I don't think it actually are, the leader ones have got different fork ends, just sayin...

You're probably right. I guess I was a little peeved after is post in the nursery and this http://www.lfgss.com/post2463600-88.html