You are reading a single comment by @STE5 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • why not include a "more practical seating layout" in the design then?

    those steps either side are not seating BTW.

    for those of you asking why i'm "being negative" towards the design it's because i want a positive outcome and a workable design that improves the site for cyclists and spectators.
    I don't think the current design does this and would be poor way to spend £5million.
    I do hope it gets improved on or another practice that has a grasp of what's required and can be bothered to think about the issues at the site gets a chance to tender.

    People are more compliant when they're not defensive, you could list your thoughts as constructive criticism and add them to the list.

About

Avatar for STE5 @STE5 started