-
• #40427
^^ saddle on that moser >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-
• #40428
-
• #40429
-
• #40430
Is that actually true, or do people just think it's going to be? The consensus among testers seems to be that a disc can actually be less of a liability than a deep section wheel in a crosswind.
Perhaps the dynamics of riding a banked velodrome in high winds (with the associated angle changes from use of the banking) differ significantly to the crosswinds experienced on a road time trial? I can't say.
I have, however seen a rider blown completely off the track (from behind a derny) on a windy day when his 4 spokes caught the wind, and a rider with a front disc nearly leave an indoor track involuntarily when someone opened the double doors down the tunnel and let a draft through.But mostly it's because you ride so close to others in bunch racing and a slight change can cause big crashes, a slight deviation for a lone TT'er might not be so disastrous?
Also disc use at club level is mainstream in TT but not so in track.
-
• #40431
...on a windy day when his 4 spokes caught the wind, and a rider with a front disc nearly leave an indoor track...
So a 4-spoke and a front disc are problematic, still no data for rear discs :-)
Not being wilfully argumentative, but I'm plenty old enough to have seen a lot (but not all, yet) of the superstition in cycling overturned by proper scientific analysis, and I'm wondering whether people's fear of using a rear disc in windy conditions is superstition or science.
-
• #40432
-
• #40433
any pogliaghi is instant porn
-
• #40434
Even if they're reposted.
-
• #40435
any pogliaghi is instant porn
Rly?
1 Attachment
-
• #40436
Not being wilfully argumentative, but I'm plenty old enough to have seen a lot (but not all, yet) of the superstition in cycling overturned by proper scientific analysis, and I'm wondering whether people's fear of using a rear disc in windy conditions is superstition or science.
I agree, I'm not arguing for wind being a huge factor on rear discs, more so a reason why discs are not widely used on outdoor tracks.
Personally I have ridden a rear disc (flat one too) in the worst conditions I've ever ridden in outdoors and there was more effect from the wind hitting my bodily frontal area when I stood up than anything affecting the wheels.
I suppose the reparability of a ds wheel might be a factor for some, given the likelyhood of accidents.
-
• #40437
Rly?
hahahahaa awesome
-
• #40438
Even if they're reposted.
repost police >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-
• #40439
-
• #40440
-
• #40441
repost police >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-
• #40442
Wow, a purple Cannondale Track with pink writing, I want to see a side-on photo!
-
• #40443
Do want.
-
• #40444
-
• #40445
[URL="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5002/5293070458_b52321da11_b.jpg
]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5002/5293070458_b52321da11_b.jpg[/URL]Really? I'm sure it's a great bike, but aesthetically? The frame looks like a poodle in heat or sth.
-
• #40446
-
• #40447
Very nice.^^
-
• #40448
Who is it with this frame on the forum, I think they have the geared accompaniment as well?
-
• #40449
• Balki
• The Caped Crusader (it's with me)
• Pistoffsky (had it and sold it, both track and geared) -
• #40450
looks very much like a cannondale without the canti track ends.
lovely
Is that actually true, or do people just think it's going to be? The consensus among testers seems to be that a disc can actually be less of a liability than a deep section wheel in a crosswind. Something about how suddenly and at what angle of attack it stalls, I think, and it's obviously going to be different between flat discs and lenticular ones. At over 90kg, I fall into the class of people who are not going to let some little breeze push them about...