• some cultures practice male circumcision as well, and whilst I am confident the level of harm is less than the female equivalent I struggle to see how that is any sort of justification.

    [apologies for thread derail, anyone who wishes to continue this may wish to start a new thread!]

    Male circumcision is nothing like the female sort.

    The male sort has medical/health/aesthetic benefits and does not harm the function of the organ. In fact the NHS offer it as a service free of charge.

    The female sort is rather fucked up. The "components" dealt with are far more sensitive and could do with some proper surgical skill. But instead you have some fucktard hacking away aiming to remove the entire clitoris. If the goal is achieved without further injury, the girl is left without a pleasure giving bodypart. But it is undoubtedly extremely painful a procedure and full of risks.

About

Avatar for DFP @DFP started