One of the risks of the Olympics has always been that in the end there would be actual loss of facilities in London. I suspect we still won't have a world class atheletics stadium and we won't have any more 50m pools than we did in 2007; big pools really matter to swimmers .
Cycling, having lost the Eastway will now loose HH , but the replacement will be elite facilites with limited access. Yes, there will be the Velopark, but I want to see the contracts signed before I believe that will happen.
Yes , I know Hogg Hill replaced the Eastway, but its not really become a London track , not in the way the Eastway was.
Will the olympics actually mean there is no real increase in facilties for cycle sport I london? I fear they may. So save HH , build the Velo park and keep Hogg Hill.
One of the risks of the Olympics has always been that in the end there would be actual loss of facilities in London. I suspect we still won't have a world class atheletics stadium and we won't have any more 50m pools than we did in 2007; big pools really matter to swimmers .
Cycling, having lost the Eastway will now loose HH , but the replacement will be elite facilites with limited access. Yes, there will be the Velopark, but I want to see the contracts signed before I believe that will happen.
Yes , I know Hogg Hill replaced the Eastway, but its not really become a London track , not in the way the Eastway was.
Will the olympics actually mean there is no real increase in facilties for cycle sport I london? I fear they may. So save HH , build the Velo park and keep Hogg Hill.