People are passionate about polo... it's not a bad thing.
+1
Re. my comments and feelings, I've not intended to imply anyones been a dick...so sorry if anyone thinks that. I was just expressing my opinion about changing a fundamental playing rule...guess only because I'm protective and passionate in my own way about what polo has become to me and how i play within the current rules. I guess, if the 'world' of people were to revert against some of the current rules, I'd have to play along in the end.
I was also all in for the mix up team idea (ive got an awesome one after all ;-0 ) but i was just sticking up for a minority where the 'never played together' rule was being enforced a bit too hard ie not allowing DT and Sarah to play together is a bit of shame...its not a big deal to any of us if they did play, but to them esp Sarah, it means the polo world!
Anyway...enough going over old ground...sure the organizers will do whats best at the end of the day.
+1
Re. my comments and feelings, I've not intended to imply anyones been a dick...so sorry if anyone thinks that. I was just expressing my opinion about changing a fundamental playing rule...guess only because I'm protective and passionate in my own way about what polo has become to me and how i play within the current rules. I guess, if the 'world' of people were to revert against some of the current rules, I'd have to play along in the end.
I was also all in for the mix up team idea (ive got an awesome one after all ;-0 ) but i was just sticking up for a minority where the 'never played together' rule was being enforced a bit too hard ie not allowing DT and Sarah to play together is a bit of shame...its not a big deal to any of us if they did play, but to them esp Sarah, it means the polo world!
Anyway...enough going over old ground...sure the organizers will do whats best at the end of the day.