Bike porn

i would'nt feel comfortable riding one of them ^

Really like this colourway.

http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o284/toom1982/DSC04673.jpg

http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o284/toom1982/DSC04672.jpg

http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o284/toom1982/DSC04674.jpg

RIH Amsterdam 1984 frame

Nothing special IMO, an already bland frame let down by an uninspired paintjob.

I have ridden MTBs since 1985 when did you first ride one?

Good luck riding a bike setup like that up hill. I would choose single speed for that sort of bike setup every time as riding up hills and any distance is not what it is made for. You are thinking of an XC bike I think...

actually around 1985. that bike is more fun with gears, but simpler quieter and able to bar spin without them. asking why it has gears is just stupid because the answer is obvious. It's so you don't have to push it up everything with an incline while also being able go down hills without spinning out. Its about as dumb as asking why others don't have gears. that answer is obvious too.

yeah, not that impressed, handling on a R3SL made it feel sluggish and unresponsive, also a tad soft.
S3 was rock hard and way to unforgettable for long distances, fast, but not a bike i would consider buying.

eh. i love em.

me likeS that deRosa up there
very mucho

Just needs a seat change. The Rolls is far too big (and gold!) for the otherwise delicate bike/parts

This

Defo needs tape too

Lovely bike otherwise though

If you have at least £3k...

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/softride-fas-tt-carbon-fibre-alu-triathlon-aerobike-zip-/260659321792?pt=UK_Bikes_GL&hash=item3cb0819bc0

yeah man,
me likeZ that colnago also

that colnago is boring

much more interesting

that colnago is boring

I'm sure this is more to your liking.

fuck yeah, a visp. No stickers though. Stem is upside down and no pedals as well, anti.

but it's got matching tires and chain

Those Visp's are an insult to track bicycles around the world.

I would rather ride a Unipac

ride mine then say that

Those Visp's are an insult to track bicycles around the world.

I would rather ride a Unipac

Why ?

Surely Visp is preferable to unipack, but in all honestly they don't look that bad, but then again, i haven't had a close look at them so meh

vinyvillan is just trying to wind me up. But I've said my piece about Visp bikes. And to be honest, anyone is welcome to come see mine, it's not heavy, it's not made of tin, it's a decent track frame. Hell anyone is welcome to take it for a spin if they don't believe me.

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs428.snc4/47155_423117174371_91052674371_4902833_683849_n.jpg

Apparenty the Visp frame weight 2200g, and it's an alu frame.

Heavier than a Surly Steamroller.

Ed, I don't have any scales. But it's far from heavy.
It weighs no more than my 531 bike I had before with the same wheelset.

Sub 2.8kg frame (1.890 on its own), fork, and headset according to your link, Ed. The Surly is 2850 frame and fork according to your other link? Not that I care, really.