Ah, we agree on this then. yes, morality is usually on the side of the law (but not always), so lets not assume they are both the same. Therefore driving past a school at 60 is always morally despicable (but running into the 90 y/o benefit thief is not).
But do you seriously think the law would be changed to allow 60mph past a school?
I know the government/law passers/law makers are not always right but I have never seen them that wrong!
And what if the benefit thief had a good moral reason for taking the benefit?
But do you seriously think the law would be changed to allow 60mph past a school?
I know the government/law passers/law makers are not always right but I have never seen them that wrong!
And what if the benefit thief had a good moral reason for taking the benefit?