--One of the key mistakes of the original WECCZ was to have a single rate for both zones. The outer zone should be £5, the inner zone £10, non-cumulative.
--The WECCZ was undoubtedly intended as only the first segment in an outer ring of congestion charging. (They wouldn't have been able to introduce the whole of an outer ring in one go using the static enforcement camera technology. Mind you, this is purely speculation, but it doesn't make much sense not to have it as part of an outer ring.) If the endeavour to introduce such an outer ring isn't to be damaged, the WECCZ must be kept and other segments introduced.
A few more points people might want to consider if they're minded to object:
I posted this a while ago:
http://www.lfgss.com/post398291.html
--One of the key mistakes of the original WECCZ was to have a single rate for both zones. The outer zone should be £5, the inner zone £10, non-cumulative.
--The WECCZ was undoubtedly intended as only the first segment in an outer ring of congestion charging. (They wouldn't have been able to introduce the whole of an outer ring in one go using the static enforcement camera technology. Mind you, this is purely speculation, but it doesn't make much sense not to have it as part of an outer ring.) If the endeavour to introduce such an outer ring isn't to be damaged, the WECCZ must be kept and other segments introduced.