I'm still abstaining from this. I don't see how fiddling around with a few square miles, either less or more, is going to make any real tangible impact. I agree that the residents' reduction ought to be much less. But I don't see why residents ought to be chargeable when they're not driving their cars but they are parked on the street. How on earth can you charge people for NOT using their cars? Bonkers.
Because those few square miles are where the majority of people are driving to or through uncle S, how about you only charge the res's when they do drive and are part of the congestion?
Because those few square miles are where the majority of people are driving to or through uncle S, how about you only charge the res's when they do drive and are part of the congestion?