I haven't really been able to pinpoint a... well... point in this ^ ?
Are you saying even if he doped, he did it really well. And therefore, it's not really doping because the machines didn't catch it? And that if he was doping, so were others, so he still won fair and square?
I haven't really been able to pinpoint a... well... point in this ^ ?
Are you saying even if he doped, he did it really well. And therefore, it's not really doping because the machines didn't catch it? And that if he was doping, so were others, so he still won fair and square?