I thought this was interesting in the NYT article:
At least two of the people Landis implicated said they had met with investigators to tell of their past involvement with doping. They did not provide details of those meetings, but both said they were honest in responding to the investigators’ questions. Those men, long followers of cycling’s code of silence that kept doping a secret, did not want their names published for fear of retribution during racing at the Tour.
Perhaps the WSJ article will involve some more naming and shaming.
Yup.
I thought this was interesting in the NYT article:
Perhaps the WSJ article will involve some more naming and shaming.