When asked to support your own claims with evidence you refuse to do so.
You then ask others to find evidence that disproves your claim.
And then when people ask you what you would accept as evidence against the claim you refuse to say.
Even without picking up on mashton's (very valid) point about why the onus is on the proponent of a claim to prove it rather than on your audience to disprove it - we seemed to have moved into an entirely new area of enquiry here.
The problem here is...you are asking for proof...rather than making a counter argument...there is still a huge amount of proof missing from the darwinian notion of evolution...there huge gaping holes in most of it..with many many missing links..still missing in 200 years...however, It is held up as the model of evolution.
If you actually sat down and though about what I said...and then told me that it couldn't happen because of this this and this...I would actually bother to argue with you...as it is...
You are just shouting proof, evidence and fraud at every opportunity.
You are supposed to be the thinker...why not think?
I'm not asking you for anything other than a counter point...as it is...you haven't one...other than questioning my character?
The problem here is...you are asking for proof...rather than making a counter argument...there is still a huge amount of proof missing from the darwinian notion of evolution...there huge gaping holes in most of it..with many many missing links..still missing in 200 years...however, It is held up as the model of evolution.
If you actually sat down and though about what I said...and then told me that it couldn't happen because of this this and this...I would actually bother to argue with you...as it is...
You are just shouting proof, evidence and fraud at every opportunity.
You are supposed to be the thinker...why not think?
I'm not asking you for anything other than a counter point...as it is...you haven't one...other than questioning my character?