Why you should always assume the driver has not seen you

hahaha

this is ridiculous. if you're going to bust over a roundabout just because you've got right of way you're daft.

Also does someone ask if he's okay?
Like "yeah sure ain't no thing to be hit by a car."
Douche!!!

socks with sandals... terrible

This ^

That^

That^

The other^

The other^

Could do with a bit of the other.

i disagree.
he was doing nothing wrong. if you stop the vid at :07-:09 seconds his position is correct and he is travelling at the same speed or slower than a car or motorbike would using the roundabout.
the car driver obviously isn't looking or paying attention as is 100% to blame for the collision*

*i refuse to use the word accident as this was due to lack of concentration. accident suggests the car driver has something else to blame for the collision than his own stupidity.

The other^

-1

socks with sandals... terrible

i disagree.

How can you disagree with that?

I think everyone would agree that the car is in the wrong but I don't actually think a car would go into that roundabout that fast - I know when I'm driving that those mini roundabouts are a pain & slowing down is the only thing to do (narrower spaces etc...).

The cyclist was going too fast otherwise they'd have been able to stop when they saw the car wasn't going to stop or had enough time to dodge round.

How can you disagree with that?

it's hipster fashion. school cardigans and socks/sandals is in for 2010

I think everyone would agree that the car is in the wrong but I don't actually think a car would go into that roundabout that fast - I know when I'm driving that those mini roundabouts are a pain & slowing down is the only thing to do (narrower spaces etc...).

The cyclist was going too fast otherwise they'd have been able to stop when they saw the car wasn't going to stop or had enough time to dodge round.

Fuck off you numpty twat! You must be fucking kidding?

I swear this has already been in full discussion here? Why 2 threads?

Fuck off you numpty twat! You must be fucking kidding?

come on andy you nob, you see how these tossers ride everyday. don't be so surprised at their idiotic reasoning

Ha.

both cars cross the lines

*i refuse to use the word accident as this was due to lack of concentration. accident suggests the car driver has something else to blame for the collision than his own stupidity.

wham... straight from the Hot Fuzz school of motoring.

@andyp No need for name calling or acting like a child. I put my opinion accross, others have agreed that the cyclist was going too fast - what do you think I'm kidding about?

If you don't agree then fine but please explain explain why...

Oh ffs. If you can't see why you're a numpty then there's no hope for any of us.

The cyclist is obeying the law at all times yet gets taken out. He is utterly blameless.

double facepalm?

Give us hope, please explain.

Obeying the law doesn't make them blameless - it would have been sensible to slow down, given the fact they were entering a roundabout & that said roundabout had at least two cars approaching it - are you seriously disagreeing with that?

I just don't get why the stupid idiot didn't bunnyhop the fucking car.

Yes. His right of way is not affected by either cars.

With that I'm out. Repeating the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the classic symptom of insanity.

I just don't get why the stupid idiot didn't bunnyhop the fucking car.

http://www.lfgss.com/thread42997.html#post1387318

:D