Anarchism

Tynan...that is how you make a 'free energy machine'.

You did know know that, didn't you? oh, despite you being an well read on free energy machines and electromagnetism, as obviously to disregard them so easily you must be pretty gee'd up on that stuff, otherwise you would be you unaware of these being related.

You make a fair point, I am completely unaware and I am certainly not well read on the subject, my searches have not produced anything credible, not sure what to do really, sure there are people who claim to know about these devices and claim to have seen the kind of information that would dispel any scepticism, but these people want to keep this information secret or think others undeserving of it, it's a really odd old situation - which leaves me with no way of verifying the idea.

I pulled a figure off google about the football pitch every 4 seconds...so that is erronuous...you maths proves it...actually going by your maths, it's more like a football pitch less than every two seconds? the figure for 56,000 is mentioned on a few sites.

Yes, like I said, information grabbed off some website somewhere and repeated here, it's best to check these things.

I still fail to see how this has nothing to do with anarchy, you claim that free energy, deforestation, tigers penises, and all the other stuff...are unrelated...

Don't get me wrong, anarchy is a broad philosophical and ideological canvas and I am sure you could make a decent argument to include just about any subject in a discussion of anarchy, including . . .

Plots to use vaccines to kill off mankind.

Multi-national corporations trying to destroy the health of the planet.

The seas viscosity changing due to plastic waste.

Acid rain.

The 'end times'

America as a global arms dealer.

Women getting the vote.

The works of Schauberger.

The imminent water shortage problem.

The depletion of the fish stocks.

Systematic demolition of the worlds forests.

The eruption of Pinatubo / Krakatoa.

The Mayan and Hindu system of counting / dating.

The fight between Thomas jefferson and the banking elite of europe.

The flood, the Epics of Gilgamesh, the inundation myths.

The Vedas dynastic system of counting.

Vimarnas / Vrishni's / Vrimils (silver metallic flying craft with weapons as powerful as 10,000 suns).

Von Daniken.

The victorians estimating civilization's age from the Bible.

The egyptian dynastic register.

Tiananmen square.

Jean Charles De Menezes.

State inerrancy.

Glacial melting.

Tigers cocks.

Whales grounding themselves.

. . . . . (and so on ad infinitum) - but the particular issue Sharkstar was challanging you on was your claim that -* "2/3rds of all plant life relies on bees to pollinate, as such, that is the end of the world"*.

so lets get this straight, rather than agree with anything I have said ie whole scale consumerism and poisoning of the entire world resoursces is bad

This is perhaps the single most comedic example of a misrepresentation of an argument I might have ever seen.

I doubt there is anyone in the world, let alone this forum who would say the that poisoning of the entire world's resoursces is a good thing.

Obviously this is not something anyone here has taken issue with, to reduce your myriad of disparate and unevidenced knowledge claims down to a simple case of *"all I was saying is that unfettered and rampant consumerism and poisoning of the entire world's resoursces is a bad idea" * - is exactly the point that was made in my thrilling 'killer ant' invasion example above.

I'm a silly bint and none of this has no relevence whatsoever as I won't post you links?

You are conflating several things here, let's split them up:

'I'm a silly bint' - no one has used your sex to challenge your ideas.

"none of this has no relevence whatsoever' - all things have some reference to something, my point was that Sharkstar was challenging a particular claim of yours, your response was to simply assert that he was wrong and you were right, then without explaining why this was the case you moved quickly on to subjects not directly related to his question.

as I won't post you links? - no, your unwillingness to share your data and information sources does not impact on the relevance of tiger cocks to Sharkstar's question, it is irrelevant to his question whether or not you back up your claims.

So, global warming and the wholesale bastardisation of the entire planet doesn't happen, and that anarchy isn't related to that argument.... as I am 'weak' on links?

Global warming is happening according to the best current evidence.

The wholesale bastardisation of the entire planet is a rather more vague claim, but I take your general point, yes there is widespread exploitation of the earth's resources.

".. as I am 'weak' on links?" No, none of this is being denied because you are 'weak on links' - in fact none of this is being denied at all by anyone at anytime. That you are 'weak on links' (cannot credibly back up your claims) is a separate issue.