It irrelevant because it was not her actions that came under scrutiny. Whether she did it for money or not (I fucking doubt it), the cop acted in a way he shouldn't have, and that is what is being discussed.
Her actions had a direct influence on his actions, how can you not see that? Of course her actions are completely relevant, if she is looking to convict him for assault. Any court will most certainly take this in to account, and they did.
Her actions had a direct influence on his actions, how can you not see that? Of course her actions are completely relevant, if she is looking to convict him for assault. Any court will most certainly take this in to account, and they did.