Meta-analysis suggests that men engaging in high risk behaviours may be placed at further risk by having a foreskin, but in the general population circumcision status is not a significant factor. It also showed an important degree of heterogeneity between studies, calling into question the validity of the summary results.2 The multiple confounding factors influencing sexual behaviour and HIV susceptibility make it irresponsible to place blame on normal anatomy.
More to it than you said. I said maybe it's a viable option in area of HIV epidemic, but that aint the case here or the US. Around 60% of US boys are cut, it's not because of HIV
jonlubi, in just the 150 word of the article was:
More to it than you said. I said maybe it's a viable option in area of HIV epidemic, but that aint the case here or the US. Around 60% of US boys are cut, it's not because of HIV
night night