-
• #52
Its funny that Range rovers seem to be exclusively driven by white middle class women or drug dealers, good protection for bad driving or bullets. Its outrageous that she was not banned
-
• #53
.......................-there are lawyers around who are able to get people off charges like this on technicalities. They have their price, so are available to you if you have the money. One's particularly famous, but I'm afraid I can't remember his name.........................
Nick Freeman.
aka mr loophole
-
• #54
because it's an aspirational newspaper and it's advertisers need to target a certain demographic.
ridiculous urban 4x4's, bmw's that do 155mph, and half a million pound houses with white decor and 40in plasma tv's in every room are seen as sophisticated status symbols by the middle classes.
they are comfortable with these lifestyle choices because they balance them out by 'caring' or doing something worthwhile like driving to the recycling center to drop off a case of australian chardonnay empties and sometimes running over one of those people who ride a bike because they can't afford a car.
like blacks, irish, jews and those illegal immigrants who drug children and clean their loo's they think this country is better off without them.
the daily mail is a marketing mans wet dream.i'll stop now before i start ranting daily mail style :-)
you would say that you loony lefty.
-
• #55
On a similar note. Here is an interesting method of dealing with traffic wardens
Again, a similarly light sentence for what could have been a nasty injury.
Sounds fucking funny though :) -
• #56
because it's an aspirational newspaper
You must mean that it's always aspiring to be a newspaper? I'm afraid I can't believe that.
-
• #57
i mean a lot of it's content is aspirational. many people desire to live a surburban life, drive an expensive depreciating asset of a motor vehicle and buy ready meals at waitrose
-
• #58
Waitrose ready meals are prety good.
-
• #59
A jury can be so stupid at times - they always seem to defer to 'expert' opinion for some reason. You only have to see the problems caused in the baby shaking cases a couple of years back to see how wrong they can be.
I always had some faith in the legal system. That was until the day I discovered a 'murderer' had moved into my flat share. I was fine with it after the initial discovery. This was mainly because I trusted a jury to get it right. The medical opinion in his case suggested an odd reaction to medication caused him to put a kitchen knife in his mate's chest killing him and then taking on 6 coppers (sans knife) and doing quite well it appears.
I thought that given a jury of his peers - obviously fucking mentalists - had found him not guilty and that the CPS hadn't pushed for manslaughter that maybe it was a medical reaction that made him do something a bit out of the ordinary.
Nah, it just turned out he hid his psychotic leanings quite well up until the day he snapped and showed his true colours. It was at that point a light went on in my brain and I realised that he was more than capable of losing it and doing great harm... I'm only glad it didn't happen in the kitchen and that my flat mates were out so he could only threaten them over the phone. lovely bloke.
In conclusion - a jury knows fuck all and are easily led. Too many people end up confusing CSI/Silent Witness/Juliet Bravo with reality
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] -
• #60
they are not bad but my experience of ready meals is not extensive as i only indulge in one every couple of months through circumstance not choice.
i had a risotto one that was nice. -
• #61
i mean a lot of it's content is aspirational. many people desire to live a surburban life, drive an expensive depreciating asset of a motor vehicle and buy ready meals at waitrose
I did get that. ;)
-
• #62
they are not bad but my experience of ready meals is not extensive as i only indulge in one every couple of months through circumstance not choice.
i had a risotto one that was nice.I lied I've never had a Waitrose ready meal.
-
• #63
I did get that. ;)
but you don't subscribe.
:-)
because it's an aspirational newspaper and it's advertisers need to target a certain demographic.
ridiculous urban 4x4's, bmw's that do 155mph, and half a million pound houses with white decor and 40in plasma tv's in every room are seen as sophisticated status symbols by the middle classes.
they are comfortable with these lifestyle choices because they balance them out by 'caring' or doing something worthwhile like driving to the recycling center to drop off a case of australian chardonnay empties and sometimes running over one of those people who ride a bike because they can't afford a car.
like blacks, irish, jews and those illegal immigrants who drug children and clean their loo's they think this country is better off without them.
the daily mail is a marketing mans wet dream.
i'll stop now before i start ranting daily mail style :-)