This week's fixtures & results League II (winter 2009/2010)

One of the points that has failed to be mentioned is that mitch does not currently have four of the same cones. There are some of the tall white cones, and some normal cones. I think this has a pretty large effect on Rik's decision (though it's for him to state really). If any of the goals had a normal cone and a tall cone, what is goal height? Is it an angled line? Is it the top of the smallest cone?

If one of cones is a small cone, but the other three are tall cones, then surely the goal height should be the top of the shortest cone, for both goals? no?

Mike brought two other of the tall thin cones for the match - they were all the same height.