I still think the main point has failed to be appreciated:
1) Rik's ruling went against the stated rules of the league
2) I challenged that on the spot
3) The goal ref (Ali) agreed that according to the standing rule (cone height), it was a goal, but he deferred to Rik for final decision
I still think the main point has failed to be appreciated:
1) Rik's ruling went against the stated rules of the league
2) I challenged that on the spot
3) The goal ref (Ali) agreed that according to the standing rule (cone height), it was a goal, but he deferred to Rik for final decision