This week's fixtures & results League II (winter 2009/2010)

Could maybe do Polo Fiasco on Saturday.
I guess any 2 of the 3 teams on Saturday: Cosmic, PF, SM

make sure you have good refs people!

what what what? what i do>? man if your gonna talk lists...
http://www.londonfgss.com/thread13803.html

1. Gabes
   
2. Snoops
   
3. Jono
   
4. Roxy
   
5. Mike
   
   

oh shit

Um Sparkle and Cosmic, I just PM'd you. Saturday?

Let's do this. Saturday Sartorial Polo!

Sparkle, we'll play you too.

Jono school of "apples and oranges" logic.

Sparkle, we'll play you too.

We're playing Zombie and Beards on Saturday.

However if BRBPC aren't playing tomorrow then get involved.

Black rebel Vs Malice

first game 1-3
BL - Dan (10:50)
Malice - Andy (8:20), Vidal (10:00, 13:50)

very equal game for the first half, Malice can't make the goal agaisn Roxy that sit very strong in goal, Dan miss some good oportunities, until Andy open the score in the 8th minute. At the end Vidal score another 3, one been anulated for been too high (some polemic at this point), and Dan one.

second game 2-1
BL - Matt (5:00, 7:30)
Malice - Iain (2:45)

first half dominated for BL, Dan very fast getting everywhere, he lost a good bauch of oportunities in the finishing, Malice look to be a bit out form, no getting his rhythm, goals from Iain and Matt. Then Vidal felll badly because of the wet shit in the far corner, 5min break. After the that BL didn't convert a few oportunities and Malice found Roxy very srong in goal.

**third game 5-2
**BL - Dan (0:40, 1:10, 5:35, 6:15), Matt (9:40)
Malice - Vidal (3:00, 4:50)
very fast due the lights, the third game open with 2 very quick goals from Dan, Malice coming back but with a lot dificulties due Dan's speed, and from there 3 more goals from BL.

Overall, Dan very quick in the breaks, but not finishing a lot of them. Iain the only one maching Dan speed, but after the second game Iain was tired and Malice pay for the it. Roxy very, very strong in goal. BL play his game. Malice unlucky even passing very well, lots of shot to goal but no luck, they couldn't get his normal control.
Is Roxy the new Sarah?

Mark or Gabes, could you put this in the blog and update the table, please

Here are rik's notes.

That makes the score:

BRBPC vs. Malice
1 - 3
2 - 1
5 - 2

i hate polemics.

First :
*right im serisoult going to fuck you moderators up, im not fucking jjoking, its out of order. fucking autocratic shits!!!! i hate children, yeh edit this twat *- now this is fucking hilarious

Second :
exactly, did apples tell Marc and Luis that the netto vs. apples result should have been different? no, we just accepted the call, carried on playing, and lost. shame we lost, but we lost. end of.

I see your point Gabes - and I ll make this clear here and now even tho I m not sure of what s beeing discussed here -

The day that this happened - the stupid ball joint rule was beeing followed; the goal ref called a goal because he didnt consider the 3 seconds of game before the shot - and I took literally 2 seconds to look at the time / Gabes balljointed and shot without me beeing aware of this - Considering the rules that were used - once again a stupid one that WILL be changed / and or modified - that should not have been a goal - unfortunately the goal ref considered his duty was only to see if the ball passed the line (which is totally mistaken - he should make sure it s effectively a goal AND a goal that respected the rules) Anyways so because I wasnt aware of that move, I trusted the lifted hand of the goal ref but immediately was contradicted by someone claiming it wasnt a goal - I then asked Gabes who was honest enough to admit he had broken the stupid rule -
All Im trying to say is that refin is not an easy thing - that s why it s a proper and central task in sports - also consider good faith and honesty because Polo is supposed to bring people together and maintain friendships - that s exactly how and why I met all of you guys !

During the Euros I yelled at Slamm for a decision he had taken - cause I didnt get it and I felt it should have been the other way around - I was wrong - the ref is the ref that s it !

eggsachery. but jsut one thing my fine friend, what the fuck is a gall?

gauls:

you re a

london doesn't miss you.

mallet packer.

why shoul I come back ? to see this ?

because it was you that he was thinking of, when i needed to use it all.
x

1. Gabes
   
2. Snoops
   
3. Jono
   
4. Roxy
   
5. Mike
   
   
   

what what what? what i do>? man if your gonna talk lists...
http://www.londonfgss.com/thread13803.html

Big fucking deal
http://www.londonfgss.com/thread12833.html#post380322

Ha. Best thread ever. And I agree with matt. Apples and oranges logic.

Allowing the goal to be ignored is a bigger deal than changing it.

If only I could get angry like snoops and matt...

Refs should be judges, not popes.

We need Cheryl Cole, she would judge the shit out of this

What goes 'against' you one day, may go 'for' you on another.
Don't be bitter Dr Matt. The result doesn't effect the game.
If you lose a higher position at the end of the season due to a -1 goal difference then you can have a big moan...

I am not arguing about this because I am worried about a single goal. I am arguing this because I think that there is a general principle here -- refs should not be able to make up rules in the middle of a game -- that needs to be defended.

My level of frustration is a function of the fact that not a single person sided with me to defend this principle on the spot, and because so many people on this forum have confused the issue and continue to confuse it, so that I have to continue to respond to the state of confusion (and bullshit), hence looking like a dick.

I've been accepting questionable calls, and deferring to the authority of the ref, since before most of you ever thought about bike polo. Questionable calls are a completely different issue than calls that directly contradict standing rules.

right, because you've played longer, what you say goes. come on.