Actually in all seriousness, this illustrates my point.
They were done for 'publishing and distributing racially inflammatory material' and 'possessing racially inflammatory material with a view to distribution.' (the operative phrase in the second part here is with a view to distribution).
They were not done for 'being racist' - 'or holding racist views' which is, of course, not in anyway illegal.
That was me, that was.
Actually in all seriousness, this illustrates my point.
They were done for 'publishing and distributing racially inflammatory material' and 'possessing racially inflammatory material with a view to distribution.' (the operative phrase in the second part here is with a view to distribution).
They were not done for 'being racist' - 'or holding racist views' which is, of course, not in anyway illegal.