Most people who deal with this subject fairly heavily lean towards the notion that the future is finite - quite what form the 'boundary' of time takes is less well known, but even rudimentary logic suggests that time itself is 'capped'.
using the tired example of a tree falling in a forest and there being no-one there to hear it, is it not fair to say that in the same way, time is only capped when there is no-one/nothing left to count it? time for you, for example, is somewhat capped upon your demise, but that doesn't mean of course that time has stopped.
using the tired example of a tree falling in a forest and there being no-one there to hear it, is it not fair to say that in the same way, time is only capped when there is no-one/nothing left to count it? time for you, for example, is somewhat capped upon your demise, but that doesn't mean of course that time has stopped.