In all fairness scott, the circumstances surronding the two different incidents are incredibly different. Jackson wasn't killed by terrorists attempting to propogate a flawed and reprehensible agenda, he was killed, ultimately by a combination of the lifestyle choices that he pursued and the arena in which he chose to live his life. In short, he bought it upon himself. I realise that it is rather more complicated than that but without going into detail, the victims of Holborn weren't aware that they could avoid their deaths.
Due to the massively differing contexts the two cases are rather incomparable.
In all fairness scott, the circumstances surronding the two different incidents are incredibly different. Jackson wasn't killed by terrorists attempting to propogate a flawed and reprehensible agenda, he was killed, ultimately by a combination of the lifestyle choices that he pursued and the arena in which he chose to live his life. In short, he bought it upon himself. I realise that it is rather more complicated than that but without going into detail, the victims of Holborn weren't aware that they could avoid their deaths.
Due to the massively differing contexts the two cases are rather incomparable.