It does, does it not? Are there not road marking there? That was a question I asked and didn't get an answer, maybe if you had the sense to read the bit of the sentance that you've seemingly forgot to quote "if not then yes, he was going too fast."
If it looks like i'm semi-defending the driver to you, that does not mean that i'm semi-defending the driver.
What exactly is semi-defending anyway? To me it sounds like i'm in the middle, considering both points of view, is that what it is?
My point about dickheads on both is that too many people think that only motorists are dickheads on the road, while i've seen a lot of cyclists being really fucking stupid on the roads, but if there's a cyclist/car interface, a lot of people here will automatically discriminate against the motorist.
That's my opinion, and I think it's a fair one.
It does, does it not? Are there not road marking there? That was a question I asked and didn't get an answer, maybe if you had the sense to read the bit of the sentance that you've seemingly forgot to quote "if not then yes, he was going too fast."
If it looks like i'm semi-defending the driver to you, that does not mean that i'm semi-defending the driver.
What exactly is semi-defending anyway? To me it sounds like i'm in the middle, considering both points of view, is that what it is?
My point about dickheads on both is that too many people think that only motorists are dickheads on the road, while i've seen a lot of cyclists being really fucking stupid on the roads, but if there's a cyclist/car interface, a lot of people here will automatically discriminate against the motorist.