Mooks, I called you a hypocrite because you posted that you'd checked other forumengers profiles to check their post history shortly after critcising me for checking your previous posts. I think this may be fairly common behaviour used to better understanding of the person you are talking too.
but just to prove the point.....
Hypocrisy fail...
I would be a hypocrite if I'd said what I did (that most of the regular posters to this thread don't contribute to other parts of the site), when in fact I didn't contribute anything to the site myself.
My criticism of you was the fact that you referred to my post history to undermine my position. If that's not 'argumentum ad hominem' I don't know what is.
At the end of the day though, if someone was saying 'that mooks is a top bloke' and you turned round and - within my earshot - said 'no - he's a cunt', I think I'd be well within my rights to feel aggrieved. That said, if you did look at my posts and feel that they were just as distasteful as a girl on a bike with her tits out, I'd be more than willing to think long and hard about what I'd done.
What I've done is to point out that just as you don't like some of the images posted I don't like the way you have dealt with this issue and those who posted the images. I have recognised from the outset that some members find some of the images distasteful, it is a shame that you still can't recognise that my issue is not with the validity of the images but with your pious attitude. FYI I'd rather be a little weird and a 'strange individual' than have to carry that bag of King Edwards that resides on your shoulder.
If you find my posting pious and condescending, that's your problem. I'm not going to be shamed into not posting just because I happen to see more than two tits and a hole when I see a woman.
Hypocrisy fail...
I would be a hypocrite if I'd said what I did (that most of the regular posters to this thread don't contribute to other parts of the site), when in fact I didn't contribute anything to the site myself.
My criticism of you was the fact that you referred to my post history to undermine my position. If that's not 'argumentum ad hominem' I don't know what is.
At the end of the day though, if someone was saying 'that mooks is a top bloke' and you turned round and - within my earshot - said 'no - he's a cunt', I think I'd be well within my rights to feel aggrieved. That said, if you did look at my posts and feel that they were just as distasteful as a girl on a bike with her tits out, I'd be more than willing to think long and hard about what I'd done.
If you find my posting pious and condescending, that's your problem. I'm not going to be shamed into not posting just because I happen to see more than two tits and a hole when I see a woman.