Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

You deduced all that about me from a few posts on an internet forum? You would be a fucking psychic if one word of it was accurate, but it isn't, so you're just an idiot. You're not just an idiot because you came to such staggeringly inaccurate conclusions about me, you're an idiot because you think you are even in a position to come to any such conclusions based on a couple of hundred words written by somebody about whom you know nothing. You're not even bright enough to take my entire contribution to this thread in the round, something which might have saved you from such an embarrassing pratfall.

By the way, I have seen the groups of men you describe; I know some of the women whose job involves putting up with them all evening ithout reacting, and they hold them in a contempt borne of far more creditable experience than your silly PC posturing. Holding them in such vicarious contempt (personally, I find them ridiculous, more than contemptible), I would hardly want to gain their approbation by adopting a similar disposition, and if I did I hardly think LFGSS is the kind of place they'd hang out waiting to be impressed by me.

I don't really give much of a shit about your line that I'm an idiot, as you seem to have been an easy victim of the kind of tricks you reckon you pull - namely, getting a rise out of people. One mention of Chris Moyles and it's all hot indignation. Good. I reckon I stand pretty well with the fair few people on here who I actually care about not to worry too much over whatever it is you think I've embarrassed myself about, whether they agree with me on this matter or not.

The top and bottom of it is if you post here, the words you post will speak for you. The nature of your posts will speak for you. As your few posts are all I've had to go on, all I can do is presume you're the kind of nob who rates girls in terms of how fuckable he thinks they are, tells girls to get back to the kitchen and says stuff like "She'd get it". Start acknowledging that your internet offerings serve as the impression people will get of you in real time. If you come across like a nob in any social situation, it's only more nobbish to say something along the lines of "you don't know me" when other people are only responding to what you have shown them. And you haven't posted anything to the contrary for my money as far as I can recall.

The fact that you're now in the position of defending yourself, btw, is because you chose to identify yourself as the cause of "pointless feminist..." whatever. My original post had been a general one and I hadn't even been that fussed who started it in this instance; as I said in it, there seem to be few photos of girls that pass these days without some talk about which of them is most fuckable. The reason why you are now engaged in a to-and-fro is because you decided to make my general comment specific to yourself.

One thing is properly getting on my tits about you though. You talk about "posturing", most recently my "silly pc posturing". You're going to have to get your head round the fact that what I espouse are my considered views, not some airy-fairy conformism so I can be seen as right-on. You're going to have to get your head round the fact that there are plenty of men who are contemptuous of, not amused by and complicitous in, oafish sexual flippancy towards women. The fact you see a male who espouses such views as merely trotting out some pc forelock-tugging shows you up to be exactly the kind of person I said existed here: sneering and bigotted. I know exactly where I am in my views: your indignant defence of yours while muddying your position further suggests that you do not.