• ;462762'] And Matt, I am really serious in my dissappointment. The rumors were pretty much saying you lot bullied LC and actually chose their sub for them. I'm not only disappointed that you guys would do that but that LC and everybody present would stand for it, that's not on, the first rule of the league is that it's owned by the players.

    This is bullshit. No-one was bullied, Sarah, i'm sorry if you feel that way but there was a discussion, not bullying. And how the fuck could we have chosen a sub for them and made them play? You're right, we wouldn't do that and everybody wouldn't stand for it, and that's not what happened. We made a case as to why we were unhappy and they agreed to play someone else. Then half way through the second game when it was apparent we were kicking their ass hops had a strop. Which she is now over.

    ;462762'] I'm curious if you guys would have kicked off if Yorgo and I had chosen Brendan, Aidan or Dave as our sub in our game against Malice?

    Maybe. Like Rays question earlier as to whether we would have kicked off if they'd chosen you Mike; the situation dictated the reaction. When we played you and you chose Dale it felt fine, he's a neutral, there's no competition between us in the league and at the time it was quite open. Now we're in a different situation, there are lots of team within a few points of each other and a few goals may make a difference. When Matt heard the proposed sub was Aidan he said he felt it wasn't right and decided to voice it.

    It's a lesson for the next league, which i think should be seriously considered. I know we don't want lots of rules. And i don't think you need to rank players; it's easy to see which team is higher or lower in the league and i think that would be a good way to decide.

About