;353839']My opinion is MT forfeited. It was supposed to be a second fixture game right? And we're on the 3rd now.
NS + 3 league points, MT - 1 league point. No goal points awarded due to no goals being made. And the goal points are just a sidenote anyways, what matters is the league points. (and sticking to some sort of resemblence of the League guidlines.)
That's my opinion. But really it's up to everybody to decide.
Mike if its ok with everybody else...We've decided to take the points. I will make the changes to the this weeks fixtures thread.
Shins.
No Sympathy
Being logical about this, if you get three points, you must have got 15 goals. I think that the goals have to be awarded for any potential tie-break situations, be it season's goals or goal difference.
The question is really about how many goals the forfeiting team should be awarded. I say that it should represent a worse case scenario, which would be nil. However, given that they get -1 point, I'm also inclined to say they should receive -5 goals.
As to which I think is right, I'm not too sure about. I'm leaning towards the -5 goals for consistency.
;354694']I can't personally think of a substantial argument against that.
this is the posts trail... what do people think?