fair enough I just think that letting companies use images for free is detrimental to the photography business as a whole, because if they can get hold of images for free then why pay a photographer. Therefore taking possible business away from other photographers. I have seen this happen so much in Portsmouth that there is now no photography oppertunities at all and the local newspapers etc.... dont pay for any images because there is always someone who will do it for free believing that it is benificial for them and a little bit of fame/ publicity. I was not suggesting that you know nothing about business etc... I just disagree with the idea of letting a multi million pound organisation use an image for free.
fair enough I just think that letting companies use images for free is detrimental to the photography business as a whole, because if they can get hold of images for free then why pay a photographer. Therefore taking possible business away from other photographers. I have seen this happen so much in Portsmouth that there is now no photography oppertunities at all and the local newspapers etc.... dont pay for any images because there is always someone who will do it for free believing that it is benificial for them and a little bit of fame/ publicity. I was not suggesting that you know nothing about business etc... I just disagree with the idea of letting a multi million pound organisation use an image for free.