unfortunately I shall not be taking your advice on board because I edit my photos that is what I do, I work as a photographer and I hate to tell you this but...........people were editing photos long before photoshop in the darkroom. So dont start an anti editing debate as you obviously know nothing about photography. correct me if I am wrong.
i was saying that in my humble opinion photos with out all that editing look much nicer, and are more interesting. editing and processing techniques can look good, when used sparsely, but i don't like photos where the base is not the image, but what can be done to it in the darkroom/ photoshop. And FYI i worked both in a darkroom, and with photoshop, and studied both tecniques.
I'm not having a go, you clearly have a good eye, and know your shit. i would just like to see something less processed, but i am not an artdirecter, and probably never will be so you have no need to give a fuck about what i say, yet being american i feel the need to say it.
i was saying that in my humble opinion photos with out all that editing look much nicer, and are more interesting. editing and processing techniques can look good, when used sparsely, but i don't like photos where the base is not the image, but what can be done to it in the darkroom/ photoshop. And FYI i worked both in a darkroom, and with photoshop, and studied both tecniques.
I'm not having a go, you clearly have a good eye, and know your shit. i would just like to see something less processed, but i am not an artdirecter, and probably never will be so you have no need to give a fuck about what i say, yet being american i feel the need to say it.