You are reading a single comment by @livingasleep and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • living asleep -

    I do 100% agree in principal with the seeding. But as far as I know Roxy has seen only ONE London team who have entered as their current team line up play. She hasn't seen any of the three teams that my house makes up play as their teams. ...But I'm sure she has a fairly good guess of our abilities!!

    A RANDOM PUBLIC draw based on this system is fairer rather than a draw that she has already compiled, (especially as her boyfriend is competing!). That is what I was saying.

    Please don't be so rude to call me names.

    does little bunny want an apology? im sorry evil little bunny. i didnt mean to call you names (actually i did, but ill stop now)

    i thought we had already established that we dont want to see teams from out of town or teams with some actual skill out at 9am? I would also personally like to see the 2 best teams fight it out at in the final. the only thing a random draw will do is increase the possibility of crap games (the best playing the best early on; the worst teams making the finals; out of towners being done at 9am, etc.)

    giving benefit of the doubt to the unknowns and giving them 2 points rather than 3 is also the fairest as you dont want some really good unknowns coasting through the tourney via low seeding.

    And honestly, id be much more offended if someone accused me of trying to fix a tournament rather than being called a whinger.

About